The number of travelers using public transport in Somewhere town between 12012 and 2015.
The bar chart compares the number of passengers going by public transport in Somewhere town in the timescale of 3 years, from 12012 to 2015.
Overall, the number of Tram and Bus passengers showed an upward trend, that of Train
showed a downward trend.
In 2012, 52 thousand people used Bus, which was over twice as much as that of Tram. 3
years later, Tram became the most prevailing to
commuters when its figure experienced an unprecedented rise to 98
thousand, making it top the list. At the same time, the number of Bus
passengers quite fluctuated. It dropped significantly to 35 thousand in 2013 before
reaching the peak of 73 thousand in 2014. However, this number gathered pace and made a recovery to 62 thousand at the end of the survey.
In 2012, most of the people travelled by Train, at 76 thousand people. A striking feature
is that this number then lost momentum and plunged to its rock bottom at 15 thousand. From 2014 to 2015, the number of train commuters rebounded, from 33 thousand to 62 thousand
respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s later, Tram became the most prevailing to commuters when its figure experience...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68044070442 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3825700037 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19576870283 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790141350467 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112246087381 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676911506523 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111326322766 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.