Oil Production Capacity
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares six countries in terms of the ability to produce oil from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, throughout a period of time, Qatar always had the lowest capacity of producing oil, while Saudi's capacity was always higher than other countries. Moreover, all countries tended to increase over a period of time.
It presented that between 1990 and 2010, there was a significant growth in oil barrels. In 1990, it reached just over 8 million barrels of oil manufactured then it went up steadily and reached a peak of 15 million barrels of oil by 2010. In contrast, in 1990 Qatar stood at just 0,5 million barrel. 10 years later, the oil production capacity of it had a slight increase, but after that, the figure for oil barrels continued to rise and in 2010 it gained only 1 million.
The other countries also had a slight upward trend over period of time. In 1990, the number of oil barrels manufactured per day in Iran was almost 3 millions compared to about 2 million barrels of oil produced in the other 3 countries. While Ỉran, Iraq and Kuwait continued going up, UAE's estimated figure didn't change in 2005. By 2010, all of them stopped at around 4 million barrels of oil products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity to produce oil from 1990 to 2010. Overall, throughout a period of time, Q...
^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...0 to 2010. Overall, throughout a period of time, Qatar always had the lowest capacity o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...all countries tended to increase over a period of time. It presented that between 1990 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to increase over a period of time. It presented that between 1990 and 2010...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and in 2010 it gained only 1 million. The other countries also had a slight u...
^^^^
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries also had a slight upward trend over period of time. In 1990, the number of o...
^^
Line 13, column 59, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...es also had a slight upward trend over period of time. In 1990, the number of oil barrels man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ntinued going up, UAEs estimated figure didnt change in 2005. By 2010, all of them st...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70283018868 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49910539351 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8128160069 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844188576621 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361117967512 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318108095016 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533000283928 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235051211039 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.