Oil use of major consumers
The line graph compares figures for daily oil use by major consumers namely the US, China, the Middle East, Western Europe, and Japan between 2009 and 2019.
It is noticeable that there was a downward trend in oil consumption in the US, Western countries, and Japan, as opposed to the figure for China and the Middle East nations. Furthermore, while the US was the biggest oil consumer in each year, the Middle East consumed the lowest amount of oil for the majority of the given period.
In 2009, Americans consumed a total of 10 million barrels of oil per day, compared to 4 million for Western European countries and Japan. During the same year, the daily oil consumption of China and the Middle East area was identical, at 2 million each. Over the following 3 years, there was an upward trend in oil consumption both in China and Middle East nations, with the figures rising to approximately 3.2 million and 2.2 million respectively. By contrast, oil use in Western Europe and Japan fell by 1 million, whereas the figure for the US remained stable.
Over the following 3 years, China and the Middle East saw a steady climb in the amount of oil consumed, with the figures reaching 3 and just under 4 million in 2015, respectively. However, the figure for oil use in the US decreased dramatically to hit a low/trough of 4 million barrels by the end of the period. Similarly, there was a fall of 1 million barrels in the consumption of Western Europe and Japan.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66023166023 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62589140583 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447876447876 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.083217913 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287097198029 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140722818841 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114579082285 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225215286637 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081636865599 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.