Worldwide mobile phone sales in 2005 & 2006 (share of market)
The table compares leading mobile phone vendors in terms of their market share in two years 2005 and 2006.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the market share of Nokia, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson, as opposed to Samsung, L.G, BenQ Mobile, and other manufacturers. Also, Nokia was the clear market leader in both years.
Nokia led the smartphone market in 2005 and 2006, with the market share accounting for 32.5% and 35% of total sales respectively. Its closest rival, Motorola, witnessed a rise of 5% in the market share, from 17.7% to 21.1% over the same period. Sony was the other vendor that saw a rise in its smartphone sales, with the figure rising by around 1%.
Samsung came in a third position in terms of sales in 2005 with a share of 12.7%, which then dropped to 11.8% a year later. Besides, both LG and BenQ reported a fall in sales over the period, with the figures for the latter noticeably seeing a dramatic decline of 2.5%. Other manufacturers, constituting 19.2% of the global smartphone sales in 2005, saw a considerable decrease of 4% at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...Sony Ericsson, as opposed to Samsung, L.G, BenQ Mobile, and other manufacturers. ...
^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecrease of 4% at the end of the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66145833333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51116754849 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8037206102 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358532021125 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147608807529 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129592386817 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227887614927 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112609774196 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.