Should people be allowed to obscure/hide their identity online?
It is true that social media and other online platforms have become a powerful communication tool. While some people believe that to maintain the order as well as security of the online world, people should be transparent about who they are and where they come from. I believe that Internet users should have the right to be anonymous.
On the one hand, complete transparency about web users’ identity could benefit society as a whole. Should everyone be provided with an identification to access the virtual world, the incidence of cyber-crimes and online abuses would significantly diminish. Granted online access would integrate the two separate worlds, and, what offenders committed online realms not be punished any less severe than what they did in the actual world. For example, by linking their online presence closely to their actual presence, potential offenders would be more aware of the possibility of being caught and the subsequent punishments. Since most cyber-bullies take advantage of multiple online accounts that they use to attack their victims online, the one and only valid online identification would deprive them of the tools of hurting people in the first place.
On the other hand, people should have the right to remain synonymous online as they do in reality. Be it online or offline conversations, people only exercise the freedom of speech to the fullest when there are no threats of later punishments from people of authority or of personal revenge. Recent cases of Me too campaigns, which are a response from females and feminists to the oppression and abuses by male employers are a gold example. If they were not allowed to conceal their names and personal information, far fewer abused women would come forward to bring their super-ordinates’ sexual harassment to light.
In conclusion, even though an official online identification could act as a deterrence for online crimes, it undermines human rights to freedom of speech and precludes the possibility of sensitive cases of offenses being reported.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e of multiple online accounts that they use to attack their victims online, the one...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25609756098 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86919887792 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2832652803 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.615384615 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361873357855 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122738882079 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583005183254 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208818521426 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603099777238 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.