% of people using multiple social networking site in Canada.
The data regarding the proportion of people of Canada who using various social networking websites in the year between 2014 and 2015 is illustrated by the given bar graph.
On having an overall, it is apparent that maximum Canadians prefered to using a particular site and an another feature that cannot be ignored that minimum people interested to operate five sities.
Upon analysing the chart, it is evident that more than a fifth people did not using any site throught the period. Whereas, similar ratio of Canadians using two sites from 2014 and 2015. Additionally, one site was using by majority of people that was accounted for 36% and 28% in 2014 and 2015 respectively.
Probing further, in case of rest of websites it is cleared that in 2014 more than one in ten proportion of the total population of Canada using three sites and this ratio was go northward by the difference of 4% in 2015. Furthermore, in the former year four sites witnessed downward trend with 5% as compared to later year and with regards of the percentage of five sites users they experienced doubled inclined of 2% in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a feature' or 'another feature'.
Suggestion: a feature; another feature
...prefered to using a particular site and an another feature that cannot be ignored that minimum peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...t that more than a fifth people did not using any site throught the period. Whereas, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...da using three sites and this ratio was go northward by the difference of 4% in 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77604166667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60657700953 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6716477739 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351035597148 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160390250945 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619401519637 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205759228197 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666404041873 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.