The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts show information on the proportion of Australia's native residents and migrants living in cities, rural and towns between 1995 and 2010.
Overall, in a period of 15 years, the total number of people living in town and rural areas from two groups of citizens decreased while there was a significant increase in Australia’s city dwellers, which constituted the largest group of citizens among three regions.
Regarding the indigenous population of Australia, in 1995, the proportion of city inhabitants was the highest with nearly 50% before it had exceeded 60% by 2010. Despite the increase in urban residents, the proportion of rural inhabitants dropped from over 30% (1995) to under 20% (2010). The percentage of Australia’s townspeople also decreased slightly in 15 years.
In terms of immigrants to Australia, the percentage of people living in cities soared from 60% to 80% in 15 years. However, at the same time, the percentage of rural citizens fell tenfold from 40% to around 10%. Moreover, there were slightly fewer people residing in towns in 2010 compared to in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rural and towns between 1995 and 2010. Overall, in a period of 15 years, the to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...group of citizens among three regions. Regarding the indigenous population of A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e also decreased slightly in 15 years. In terms of immigrants to Australia, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16292134831 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83885804695 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1498851705 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259313650999 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122109391027 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574836896284 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16993576271 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543057904051 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.