Percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features
The given table shows us information about how people used their mobile phones for multiple purposes in the year 2006, 2008 and 2010.
It is clear that throughout the given period, the main reason for people to have cell phones is always to be able to make phone calls. However, as time went by, there were some dramatic increases in the figures for other functions of mobile phones.
In 2016, 100% of people used their cell phones to make calls. The second popular function was messaging as its usage level stood at 73%. By contrast, the proportions of owners who used their mobile phones as multimedia tools to play game or music were significantly lower, at less than 20% respectively. Furthermore, internet and recording video features were not available on mobile devices at that time.
Throughout the next 4 years, dialing and messaging remained to be the most used features on mobile phones with some insignificant changes in numbers. Meanwhile, the proportion of people using internet features on their phones increased sharply and stood at 41% in 2008 before jumping to 73% in 2010. Similarly, video recording was not available in 2006, but became more and more popular since 2008 and had the percentage of 35% at the end of the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for other functions of mobile phones. In 2016, 100% of people used their cell ...
^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ailable on mobile devices at that time. Throughout the next 4 years, dialing and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9014084507 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53709719455 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9689564161 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371334067882 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146085896932 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832559746066 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23240582738 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424063791243 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.