Primary funding sources
The given chart compares the numbers of foreign students in the U.S. and the percentages of money they received from six different sources in two school years, 2003/04 and 2013/14.
It is noticable that over the given decade, the number of international students studying in the U.S.’s universities significantly increased. And the most popular funding source for those student was either from themself or their family.
In the school year 2003/04, there were around 57000 exotic students attending universities in the U.S. The proportion of students who received financial supports from their family was 67%, almost threefold higher compared to the figure for the second popular source of funding, which came from U.S College or University.
After a decade, the total number of international students in the U.S. increased by 55%, stood at over 880000. Similarly, two major financial resources were still derived from either those students’ families or their colleges, together accounted for 84%. Meanwhile, there was a nearly fourfold increase in figures for oversea students who received funding from foreign government or university or from their employments. Even though, those numbers for both these sources only took up around 7% respectively in the year 2013/14.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...And the most popular funding source for those student was either from themself or their famil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ar source of funding, which came from U.S College or University. After a decad...
^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch came from U.S College or University. After a decade, the total number of inte...
^^^
Line 4, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 7% respectively in the year 2013/14.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52791878173 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81873560785 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0759830342 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.125 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111899938958 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059826019704 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640935577729 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838005471849 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336875970446 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.