The diagrams illustrate the potential changes to the layout of a conference center.
It is immediately apparent that some changes are likely to occur both inside and outside of the conference center, which will make it more accessible and convenient.
Currently, a conference participant can arrive this building by vehicles. Driving along the road in front of the building, and there is a branch nearby the center, at which the participant can park cars. Going further in this branch, a garden is located in this way. The left and right hand direction are toilets and café, respectively. Crossing the reception, there is a corridor, and in the left of it are two meeting rooms, whereas, the right is a spacious hall.
According to the future plan, the branch is likely to be replaced and both the car park and the garden are projected to be expended. The café was replaced by a fitness center, and it is planned to rebuild nearby the hall, sharing a considerable space with kitchen, which is projected to build in the corner of this center. The meeting rooms will be separated from two rooms to three in the same location.
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In some countries governments pay the money for students’ university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages？ 67
- The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83076923077 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69060263469 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7373933062 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081904739378 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332960817367 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370496968125 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572856229773 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290039164862 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.