The picture below shows the plan of a museum in 1998 and after some changes were made in it in 2008.
The two maps give information about the change in a particular museum between 1998 and 2008.
In general, it can be seen that the layout of the museum significantly changed with the addition of a restaurant and the relocation of particular rooms. Most rooms expanded in size.
In 1998, the garden was located at the center of the building with three permanent exhibition rooms in the east and west and a coffee shop in the north. To the south of the museum, there were the tickets and entrance/exit. A temporary exhibition room was situated in the southwest and on the opposite side is a room for bags and coats, a WC and a shop.
In 2008, in the east of the map, all rooms were converted into three permanent exhibition rooms. The temporary exhibition room was in front of the bags and coats room and the shop in the southwest corner, while a new restaurant was constructed next to the cafe. The coffee shop reduced its size to move the WC in. The garden was beautified with some fountains and a cafe sitting area was demarcated in the garden beside the coffee shop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hop reduced its size to move the WC in. The garden was beautified with some fountai...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55958549223 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61738560429 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7635693243 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123401070609 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597112562895 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681165881137 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101507973691 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648431296737 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.