The pictures below show the plan of walton museum in 2008 and the plan in 2012,after it was redeveloped. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two pictures illustrate the changes occurred in Walton museum in 2008 and in 2012, after it was reconstructed.
Overall, it is clear that, there was a few similarities after the reconstruction of museum in 2012 but there are many big differences took place in that year compared to 2008.
According to the first picture, in 2008, on the first floor, there was a special exhibition room, shop, and clock room sections were there. So, to reach on the second floor, the stairs was made. On the second floor, there was two section, one was for reception and other was for reading room. The south wing entrance was made on the west direction.
The second picture beholds the plan in 2012. On the first floor, special exhibition room and shops remained unchanged. But, children's play area was added in place of clock room. On the second floor, reading room also remained at the same place where reception and clock room and entrance hall was added on that floor. Third and fourth floor was built newly in this year. Restaurant and self service cafe was added on the third floor where exhibition room was built on the fourth floor. However, stairs was removed instead lift was added.
Comments
Thanks for Sharing such a…
Thanks for Sharing such a nice information. Please keep posting Stuff like this
Just Airports
Churchill Cars
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...ade. On the second floor, there was two section, one was for reception and other was fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34649372744 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5719238438 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0769230769 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180200009854 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848796887362 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747197158964 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147929588057 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637449446468 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.