The diagram illustrates a detailed explanation on how wasted bottles are made. It can be clearly seen from the picture that there are three main stages in this process.
In the first step, all second-hand bottles are gathered in a collection point before trunks transfer them to a recycled area.
Stage two begins with the process of washing all impurities and the clean bottles are then divided into three categories (namely clean, green and brown). Afterwards,those bottles are brought to a glass factory where they are going to be crushed into small pieces. Following this, glass pieces are melted in a special furnace at high temperature between 600 and 800 degree Celsius to be liquid form. Next, new liquid glass is added to recycled one to make a mixture which will be moved to the mould to create bottles' shape.
In the last stage, all those recycled bottles now becomes the useable containers foe filling different kind of drinks which are going to be sold in the market.
In conclusion, the recycled bottles manufacturing process comprises three steps which are mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , those
...amely clean, green and brown. Afterwards,those bottles are brought to a glass factory ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'containers'' or 'container's'?
Suggestion: containers'; container's
...ecycled bottles now becomes the useable containers foe filling different kind of drinks wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ufacturing process comprises three steps which are mentioned above.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99450549451 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58753876125 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2195299591 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131945270747 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578401901823 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324321817533 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713073571012 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369647403167 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.