The pie chart below presents the percentage of new job opportunities for different professional groups in Australia in the year 2001.
The prescribed pie chart illustrates the information regarding the occupation chances for diverse expert groups in Australia in the year of 2001. The data have been calibrated in the proportion.
Overall, it is evident that the management job had been phenomenon percentage, where as the researchers had less opportunity to grab a job of researchers.
Having a quick glance it is apparent that the social service was the second one highest requirement job by 1% more than a quarter. However, the engineering was the second opportunity for engineers by bare 8% in Australia in the year of 2001.
Turning towards the remaining information is that the medicine and finance had 15% and 12% percent proportions which were considerable during the period of 2001.Howeve, it was observed that the management was the most required field for interviewees by 36% of jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ent job had been phenomenon percentage, where as the researchers had less opportunity to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Howeve
... considerable during the period of 2001.Howeve, it was observed that the management wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10723316782 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9178968647 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24959845618 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118081835499 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109675691756 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141291824924 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776614037766 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.