The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years.
The pie chart provides the comparison of various kinds of energy production of France between 1995 and 2005. It is clearly seen from the given pie chart is that the most popular sources of energy was Coal whereas the least popular energy was nuclear. Looking at the pie chart, the energy was produced by coal accounted for 29.80% in 1995, which was 1% lower than it was in 2005. The minority of the nuclear energy dropped into the lowest group from 1995 to 2005, at 6.40% and 10.10% respectively. Being at the second highest portion, Petro represented 29.27% in 1995, which was as 4 times as high as nuclear was, at 6.40%. In 2005, Petro was for 19.55%, as opposed to the bottom of the list, which was nuclear at 10.10%. Meanwhile, one thirds of energy produced by Gas, which was a stability trend during the period between 1995 and 2005, approximately at 30%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 733, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one third', 'a third', or simply 'thirds'?
Suggestion: one third; a third; thirds
...which was nuclear at 10.10%. Meanwhile, one thirds of energy produced by Gas, which was a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, third, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 707.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32326918222 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.7841614091 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159383934904 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108826204221 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144218239593 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159383934904 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.