the pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie chart depict the difference of distinct types of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005 .The data is calibrated in percentage.
It can be vividly seen that in 1995, coal led with highest 29.80 percent, whereas gas patrol occupied second and third position respectively. Nuclear and other resources were equally reported for production.
Turning to rest of description, in 2005, coal had maximum 30.90 percent followed by gas and petrol with 30.31 and 19.55 percent orderly. Other sources was stood at lowest position. As far as comparison is concerned, in 2005 the use of other sources was twice compare to 1995 .further, there was reduction in the use of petrol in 2005 compare to 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...gy production of France in 1995 and 2005 .The data is calibrated in percentage. ...
^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... production of France in 1995 and 2005 .The data is calibrated in percentage. I...
^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'compared'.
Suggestion: compared
...2005 the use of other sources was twice compare to 1995 .further, there was reduction i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... other sources was twice compare to 1995 .further, there was reduction in the use ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 590.0 965.302439024 61% => OK
No of words: 118.0 196.424390244 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.29587325169 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62881301293 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.686440677966 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 167.4 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3492619075 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101191172979 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531953457117 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10693583113 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102875566766 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133368682598 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.