The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the worlds during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This pie chart compares four causes of land degradation in the world, while the table illustrates the percentage of these causes affected three different regions, namely North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s.
Overall, the environment primarily suffered from overgrazing, and Europe was the land which had the largest degraded areas.
According to the pie chart, the first primary reason of land degradation in the globe was over-grazing, where livestock such as cows consumed excessive amount of plants, accounted for over one-third of damage (35%). The next causes were deforestation and over-cultivation which constituted similar proportion, 30% and 28%, respectively. The last reason was other causes which only contributed 7%.
According to the table, the most degraded area in the world was Europe with 23%. Over three-fourth of it caused by deforestation (9.8) and over-cultivation (7.7). On the other hand, over-grazing mainly affected Oceania, which made up 11.3 out of a total of 13%. The least affected area was North America where a total of degraded land was a mere 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...amely North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. Overall, the environment primarily ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a total of degraded land was a mere 5%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3918128655 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05176882792 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2504166651 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164549910125 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725463095166 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629068222178 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108187328356 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074347902261 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.