Universities are becoming increasingly expensive to operate. In some countries, money from taxation has met these costs. However, this is not always enough to maintain the quality of universities.
What are some ways universities could be funded in future?
Tertiary education has become unavailable for numerous students due to its increased tuition fees. In many countries, therefore, it is not uncommon to see that the cost of education is often raised in order to keep its quality. I believe that an external funding and government support could be possible solutions to the issue.
Wealthy people, especially philanthropists can make an investment in universities. The first reason why they will direct a substantial amount of money in the future because as graduates, they are ready to assist them financially whenever these organizations are in need. Bill Gates, as an example, donates millions of dollars annually to the universities, particularly Cambridge University to support young talents. It is also anticipated that in the near future, there will be more and more young successful businessmen who will raise a fund and voluntarily contribute to the universities they will have graduated from, otherwise universities will not be available for everyone, and the quality of education, as a result, will have been affected considerably.
In addition to investors, government funding might address the problem. It is commonly believed that most countries will have been flourishing by the end of the decade and they, therefore, are able to encourage their local universities which are in financial crisis. Finland, for instance, has been supporting the half of its universities over twenty years, even though the country has experienced several economic meltdowns. It is estimated that this trend will be being applied to more countries in the globe by the following decade.
In conclusion, even if universities are struggling with finance to survive, investors can provide them with money, as well as, governments which may support them in the long term. I believe that alternative solutions also will be available; however, it will be relatively minor contributions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12387935462 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7835125421 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204101412645 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648144421155 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033820473381 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117880012616 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312696940079 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.