Universities are becoming increasingly expensive to operate. In some countries, money from taxation has met these costs. However, this is not always enough to maintain the quality of universities.
What are some ways universities could be funded in future?
Tertiary education has become unavailable for numerous students due to the increased cost of tuition fees. In many countries, therefore, it is not uncommon to see that the cost of education is often raised in order to keep its quality. I believe that an external funding and government support could be possible solutions to the issue.
Wealthy people, especially philanthropes can make an investment in universities. The first reason why they will direct a substantial amount of money in the future because they have graduated universities and are ready to assist them financially whenever these organizations are in need. Bill Gates, as an example, donates millions of dollars annually to the universities, particularly Cambridge University to support young talents. Besides, he will have doubled this amount by the next year. It is anticipated that in the near future there will be more and more young successful businessmen who will voluntarily contribute to the universities they finished, otherwise universities will not be available for everyone, and the quality of education, as a result, will have been decreased dramatically.
In addition to investors, government funding might address to the problem. It is commonly believed that most countries will have been flourishing by the end of the decade and therefore, are able to encourage their local universities to operate without financial crisis. Take, Finland as an example. The government has been supporting the half of its universities over twenty years, even though the country has experienced several economic meltdowns. In the future, it is estimated that this trend will be applied to more countries in the globe.
In conclusion, even if universities are struggling with finance to survive, investors can provide them with money, as well as, governments may support them in the long term. In my opinion, there will be available alternative solutions, but it will be relatively minor contributions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ents may support them in the long term. In my opinion, there will be available alt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39935064935 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11576515394 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1037670743 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223274756277 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065474462978 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403219350139 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126372416099 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030601549445 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.