The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the worlds during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This pie chart compares four primary causes of land degradation in the world, while the table illustrates the percentage of these causes damaged the environment of three different regions, namely North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s.
Overall, the environment primarily suffered from overgrazing, and Europe was as significantly affected as the other continents.
According to the pie chart, the first primary reason of land degradation in the globe was over-grazing, where livestock such as cows consumed excessive amount of plants, which accounted for over one-third of damage (35%). The next causes were deforestation and over-cultivation which constituted similar proportion, 30% and 28%, respectively. The remaining 7% was caused by other environmental problems.
According to the table, the most land degradation experienced in the 1990s was in Europe, with 23%. Over three-fourth of it caused by logging the trees (9.8) and over-cultivation (7.7). On the other hand, Oceania was mainly affected by over-grazing, which was responsible for 11.3 % out of a total of 13%. The least damaged environment was North America where a total of degraded area was a mere 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...amely North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. Overall, the environment primarily ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a total of degraded area was a mere 5%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5138121547 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25129905391 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6862018607 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139837461705 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061062797604 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559805565367 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920732167636 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620213465074 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.