The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
The pie chart depicts the proportions of factors leading to degradation.However,table enumerates the percentages of land degenerated by these causes in the areas in 1990s.
Overall, the main source of degradation is overgrazing.while, in Europe more land was deteriorated as compared to other regions.
To embark,a fleeting glance over pie chart shows that most of the land is degenerated due to overgrazing with 35%.whereas,overcultivation and deforestation give rise to this problem with almost same proportions with 28 and 30 percents.Also, other factors led to degradation of 7% of land .
From the scrutiny of table, during 1990s, 9.8% deforestation, 7.7% overcultivation and 3.5% overgrazing caused land degradation with 35% in Europe.In contrast,total percentage was 10% less in Oceania, the proportion was cumulated by 11.3% overgrazing and rest by cutting down of trees. In last,in North America, only 5% degradation of land was recorded, caused by 3.3% overcultivation and near half of this by overgrazing along with, negligible percentile of deforestation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...tions of factors leading to degradation.However,table enumerates the percentages of lan...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , table
...f factors leading to degradation.However,table enumerates the percentages of land dege...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...egenerated by these causes in the areas in 1990s. Overall, the main source of degrada...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
... compared to other regions. To embark,a fleeting glance over pie chart shows th...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , overcultivation
...ated due to overgrazing with 35%.whereas,overcultivation and deforestation give rise to this pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ame proportions with 28 and 30 percents.Also, other factors led to degradation of 7%...
^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...factors led to degradation of 7% of land . From the scrutiny of table, during 1...
^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...f land . From the scrutiny of table, during 1990s, 9.8% deforestation, 7.7% overcultivati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...sed land degradation with 35% in Europe.In contrast,total percentage was 10% less ...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , total
...gradation with 35% in Europe.In contrast,total percentage was 10% less in Oceania, the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...d rest by cutting down of trees. In last,in North America, only 5% degradation of l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76729559748 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.2042342867 2.65546596893 158% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.218377432 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.4 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169630266205 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962848878578 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465951794114 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107197825805 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448467164453 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.78 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.