The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world in the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates why land on the global scale experierences degradation while the table indicates the percentage of degraded land affected by 3 main reasons, categorised in 3 continents.
Overall, three main causes leading to degradation are identified as gazing, cultivation and deforestation, in which gazing seems to be slightly more popular. It is also worth pointing out that European land suffers most from the three culprits.
To begin with, 35% of land in the world is degraded due to gazing excessively, taking up the greatest share. Furthermore, it is reported that degraded land caused by destroying forest accounts for almost a third of the total proportion, which is slightly higher than the figure for over-cultivation. Apart from the aforementioned causes, it is recorded that only 7% of worldwide land is destroyed because of other factors.
Turning to the given table, North America was reported to witness less impact from the three causes with only 5% of land in this continent is degraded. In addition, 23% of land in Europe was degraded, in which the main reason was deforesting activities with nearly 10%. Moreover, over-gazing was recorded as the major cause, leading to degradation with the percentage reported at 11.3% out of 13% of degraded land in Oceania. However, it is notable that deforestating and cultivating activities nearly brought none impacts in causing degradation.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, while, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32444444444 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09441232778 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591111111111 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6940647592 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186079567017 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745079346795 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048168469731 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122771719242 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437427639482 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, while, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32444444444 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09441232778 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591111111111 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6940647592 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186079567017 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745079346795 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048168469731 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122771719242 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437427639482 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.