The first circular layout reveals the information that there were four main reasons of agriculture land become less productive. While, the tabular chart shows the causes of this phenomenon in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990. The information had given in percentum. It is clearly and coherent representative.
To begin with, the land degradation caused by four reasons , over-cultivation, overgrazing, deforestation, and other. Furthermore, over cultivation has a small percentage. It is around 28%. Whereas, over-grazing was 35%, and deforestation was 30%. There was 7% of other .
Moving further,Europe was most affected with the deforestation at 9.8%. Meanwhile, North America, and Oceania was less affected area. On the other hand, ocenia was highly influenced of over-grazing at 11.3%. North America was faced problem of over-cultivation at 3.3%.
In conclusion, it is evident that, majority of agriculture area was devasted by over-grazing. Whereas, Europe was the region, where maximum land got degraded by the same causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...non in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990. The information had given in pe...
^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... land degradation caused by four reasons , over-cultivation, overgrazing, deforest...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...restation was 30%. There was 7% of other . Moving further,Europe was most affecte...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Europe
... There was 7% of other . Moving further,Europe was most affected with the deforestatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67307692308 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42447176801 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660256410256 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5049202507 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.0 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4 22.9334400587 45% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143684121188 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460248406848 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689182485755 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993930805354 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955573564353 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.13 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.