The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990
The pie chart provides information about the four main factors that contributed to decreased agricultural efficiency globally, while the table illustrates the percentage of earth devastation in three regions due to these causes throughout the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that the largest part of total land degraded was in Europe and this was caused mainly by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing.
As can be seen from the graph that 65% of land degradation stemmed from over-grazing and deforestation, 35% and 30% respectively. Similarly, the percentage of worldwide land devastation stood at slightly less than a third. However, other factors contributed negligibly by 7%.
Regarding the causes of land damage by region, the highest part of total land degraded was in Europe (23%) compared to North America and Oceania (5% and 13% respectively). To be more precise, deforestation and over-cultivation made up nearly a tenth each of entire earth degradation in Europe, while over-grazing comprised 5.5% of all land devastation. Interestingly, over-cultivation contributed considerably to total land degradation by 3.3% in North America compared to deforestation (0.2%) and over-grazing (1.5%). In contrast, the biggest percentage of devastation made up over-grazing (13%) and deforestation constituted around 2% of land degradation in Oceania.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, similarly, third, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.785 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63722077966 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2687735781 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.555555556 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136430551196 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608385342234 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620780331587 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10028860052 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672896084536 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.