The pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all source and renewables in the year 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant .
The given circular chart corroborated the information about the amount of electricity produces by Germany and France from all source and renewables source in the year .It is clear and coherent .The data is calebrated in per-centum
It can be seen that In Germany 59.6% of electricity was generated by conventional.Thermal in the year 2009 and 17.4% electricity was produce by the renewables sources. Further classification of renewable sources were Biomass, Hydroelectric and Wind .39.3%,36.9% and 17.7% and 61% electricity had produced by the biomass, wind and Hydroelectric and solar respectively.
As per as trend was concerned in addition to this In France 75.0% electricity has been generated by the nuclear . Also conventional thermal were being produced 10.3 % and renewables sources had made 13.7% electricity in the year 2009.Further the renewables sources was divided into three different types.80.5%,8.1%, 10.5% and 0.9% electricity was produce by the Hydroelectric and biomass, wind and solar respectively.
Overall, the Germany produce maximum electricity by conventional thermal and France had been generated by the nuclear.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated the information about the amount of electricity produces by Germany and Fran...
^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es by Germany and France from all source and renewables source in the year .It is...
^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ource and renewables source in the year .It is clear and coherent .The data is ca...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...rce and renewables source in the year .It is clear and coherent .The data is cale...
^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ce in the year .It is clear and coherent .The data is calebrated in per-centum ...
^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... in the year .It is clear and coherent .The data is calebrated in per-centum It ...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thermal
...ectricity was generated by conventional.Thermal in the year 2009 and 17.4% electricity ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...droelectric and solar respectively. As per as trend was concerned in addition ...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ricity has been generated by the nuclear . Also conventional thermal were being pr...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ity has been generated by the nuclear . Also conventional thermal were being produce...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Further
...made 13.7% electricity in the year 2009.Further the renewables sources was divided int...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....7% electricity in the year 2009.Further the renewables sources was divided into ...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al thermal and France had been generated by the nuclear.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74117647059 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52657376964 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.666646766 43.030603864 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.2 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271966969175 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155503172582 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907061333683 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190147203953 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580326085906 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.2329268293 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 11.4329268293 192% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.