Government should spent money on the railway rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
"Transportation plays a significant role in the human life to travel from one place to another. Nevertheless there are some issue which are irrevocable as complex as ever. For instance, a given topic asserts that should authorities invest money on the railway or the roads. I agree upto some point and I will examine the possible reasons in the upcoming paragraphs.
The first step to understand why this happening? Broadly speaking there are various reasons. The first and foremost reasons is that environment. Government spend the money on the railways whereas people prefer the rails rather than their private vehicles. Moreover the trains carry the thousands of passengers at the same time which helps to reduce the pollution. Apart from that railway s are cheaper transportation than other transportation. Moving furthermore every person can afford the price of this vehicle so that's why it is easier for the poor people to travel and for trade. A good epitome is that London government started the railways in their country which is faster to reach the passengers to their destination. London people prefer the railway system.
On the other hand, with the development of the railway system however many people got the opportunity for work and also improve their life style and fulfill the needs of their family. The last but not least there is a no issue of the traffics jams because every trains going according to time and help to passengers to reach their destination at the time. It is very beneficial for the those people who have a jobs at the distant places and for the business persons.
There is no single conclusion for this statement. I think that government should developed the all departments in the country equally however government should balance the investment of the money on the Infrastructures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...fe to travel from one place to another. Nevertheless there are some issue which are irrevoca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... various reasons. The first and foremost reasons is that environment. Government ...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...reasons is that environment. Government spend the money on the railways whereas peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...reasons is that environment. Government spend the money on the railways whereas peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ils rather than their private vehicles. Moreover the trains carry the thousands of passe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...can afford the price of this vehicle so thats why it is easier for the poor people to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a job' or simply 'jobs'?
Suggestion: a job; jobs
...eneficial for the those people who have a jobs at the distant places and for the busin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, apart from, broadly speaking, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07947019868 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86883411883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546357615894 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.512343967 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170471769223 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051555618029 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750396075913 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107710977997 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546372044189 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.