Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In a technology-driven world, many believe that this will help on solving most of our environmental issues we are facing today. I strongly disagree, in proffering solutions to our ailing environment, there with the emission of green house gases and restriction of most human activities in our ecosystem amongst others.
On the one hand, restriction of human activities such as poaching, hunting, burn burning, and farming activities on our lands will aid in protecting our environment against erosion and earthquake. This can be achievable by setting up camps near our forested areas, employing spy police, and most importantly, imposing fines and penalties to defaulters. By doing this, our lands will not be tempered with.
Nevertheless, emission of green house gases such as burning of fossil fuels can br replaced by gasoline to avoid environmental pollution. Increasing the cost of fossil fuels, producing more of gasoline cars and electrically used tools and equipment will aid protect our environment.
Furthermore, to ensure a safety environment, there must be viable drainage system that can control flood and the populace should be educated on the disadvantage of dumping refuse in the gutters to avoid blockage of the drainage canal. This can be done through radio giggles, free seminars and workshops for proper awareness.
Finally, the city developers should not approve housing plans that are situated in locations that are prone to erosion to avoid blocking the flow of flood. The should be close monitoring and demolition of such properties.
To sum up, even as technology is believed to be a solution to most of our ailing issues in the world today, to ensure a safe and secure ecosystem free from environmental problems human activities must be closely monitored and the citizenry enlightened on the importance of keeping the environment safe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, nevertheless, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0362864384 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8467943237 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181181753226 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701164932024 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895790496845 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936929893078 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885707931556 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.