In a number of countries, some people think that it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Good transport facilities plays an important role in the lives of the people, community likewise the government. However, many individual believe that huge money should be used in the construction of new railway tracks to create fast trains between cities. Others say that the money should be used on the improvement of already existed public transport. This essay will analyse both views and draw a conclusion.
Although, it is believed that trains are much more environmental friendly than cars,and efficient train services will encourage people to leave their cars at home, which will reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions. Nevertheless, considering the fact that trains have their timetable and stooping points, many passengers will miss them and have to wait for the next available ones. This will lead to many people missing important appointments, causing uneasiness, stressfulness and uncomfort. For instance, my uncle who has been unemployed for almost 5 years missed his scheduled job interview because he got to the train station 5 minutes after the train had left. He felt so frustrated and depressed.
Should money be spent on improving existing public transport? I believe this is a more better option as the populace needs better road infrastructure and good public transport. This will aid in reducing traffic jams, increase safety driving and serve as a good link network between the urban and rural areas. Furthermore, since each motorist pay tax that generate more revenue to the government, they are encouraged to create new road links and network for the people. For example, the Lagos state government in Nigeria, have extended the city roads, create new ones and provides new subsidized buses to ease traffic jams and ease transportation problems.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, l think that spending more money in the improvement of the already existing public transport facilities will be more beneficial to both the government and it's citizenry. For instance, it will reduce traffic congestion, increase safety driving and amongst others generate more revenue to the government through payment of taxes and road fines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le in the lives of the people, community likewise the government. However, many i...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and draw a conclusion. Although, it is believed that trains are much more...
^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ch more environmental friendly than cars,and efficient train services will encourage...
^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, causing uneasiness, stressfulness and uncomfort. For instance, my uncle who ha...
^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he train had left. He felt so frustrated and depressed. Should money be spen...
^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld money be spent on improving existing public transport? I believe this is a m...
^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... public transport? I believe this is a more better option as the populace needs better roa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the urban and rural areas. Furthermore, since each motorist pay tax that generat...
^^
Line 9, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generate more revenue to the government, they are encouraged to create new road ...
^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the government, they are encouraged to create new road links and network for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, likewise, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38081395349 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79736213678 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578488372093 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1559885308 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320703870717 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11486846275 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131185269914 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207081146928 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982515402663 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.