Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
When everyone is committed to working together and sharing the responsibilities equally, partnering with others on school tasks can be very effective. However, since working alone offers greater control over the outcome of a project, including the grade, I prefer to complete assignments on my own.
Without question, a group is usually capable of accomplishing more than an individual. When a team can depend on one another to generate ideas and follow through with assigned tasks, the experiences is highly rewarding. This is especially true when team members bring a variety of strengths to their shared work. For example, one person may be a skilled researcher, while the other is good at math or writes well. In this ideal scenario, where everyone is committed to the project and puts forth a strong effort towards completing it, group work can be fantastic.
By contrast, a person who works alone must obviously perform all the work by herself. Yet, this too has its positive points. For example, working independently allows a person to set a convenient work schedule. If it suits best to work in the evenings or on the weekends, a person working on her own can make that choice. Furthermore, without others, a person working independently has full control of the final product. The reality is that some students work hard and care about getting excellent grades, while others do not show the same level of commitment. Group work can be highly stressful and maddening for the people who care most about the work.
Indeed, this last point is a major reason why I prefer working independently rather than with a group on school projects. In situations where all members of a group will receive the same grade for a project, inevitably some group members will end up doing more than their share. This is unfair and very frustrating.
When working alone, one may do great work or perform very poorly. In either case, however, the responsibility and the final grade are entirely one’s own. That is why I would rather work by myself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efer to complete assignments on my own. Without question, a group is usually cap...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one person may be a skilled researcher, while the other is good at math or write...
^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leting it, group work can be fantastic. By contrast, a person who works alone mu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98837209302 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73952599991 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543604651163 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5202341175 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34525873421 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107122265668 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728366696448 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195040210228 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380170445371 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.