The pie chart shows spending for different purposed inJapan and Malaysia. Summarize, report the main features and make comoarison where relevant.

Essay topics: The pie chart shows spending for different purposed inJapan and Malaysia. Summarize, report the main features and make comoarison where relevant.

Thu Mo's picture

The pie chart illustates how people use their fanancial in diver aspects of life inJapan and Malaysia.

At first glance it is clear that the people in Malaysia spends the highest income on housing while other goods and services is the most common money spending in Japan.

At can be seen that 29% of money uses for other good and services in Japan. 21% of expenses uses on housing, 1% higher than the figure of transport. Food accounts for 24% of money spending. While 6% of money uses on health care in Japan, only 3% of expenses spends in Malaysia.

The most popular percentaget of money using in Malaysia is housing, which is 34%. 26% of expenses uses for other goods and services, which is the as same as the figure of food. Transport is responsible for 10% of money in Malaysia.

Votes: 
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e most common money spending in Japan. At can be seen that 29% of money uses fo...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 651.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58450704225 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34595846655 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.933849956 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3333333333 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139917502425 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681998942866 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447393015038 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101710120582 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328438728273 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages