The pie charts above show the percentages of industry sectors contributed to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016

Essay topics:

The pie charts above show the percentages of industry sectors contributed to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.

The pie charts provide an illustration of the particular contributions various economic sectors made to the overall Turkish economy in two years: 2000 and 2016.

A brief assessment of the charts reveals that the most significant increases were in the construction and manufacturing industries, while government, and especially agriculture, experienced declines.

At the beginning of the 21st century, the agricultural sector contributed just under a quarter to the total economic output of Turkey, but by 2016 this figure had fallen dramatically to just 14%. The government sector also saw a sharp decrease, falling by a quarter to 9% in 2016. Leisure and hospitality also went down, but to a lesser degree, dropping to 14% from a 2000-level of 17%.

In terms of sector growth, the most substantial rise was in the building sector, which had been the least significant sector in 2000. By 2016, it had expanded to 10% of Turkey’s economy from a proportion of just 3% sixteen years prior. A major climb was also seen in manufacturing, with a 50% rise from 8 to 12%. The financial sector had a comparable increase, rising from 5% to 8%: a relative improvement of 60%. Finally, the sector defined as trade, utilities and transportation went up slightly from 14 to 16%, while the contribution of the combined health and education sectors remained constant at 17%.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11607142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11758047782 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602678571429 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7379492326 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286170280812 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108004630312 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851311958318 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173833508009 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996703392662 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.