The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world
The pie chart compares and contrasts the data in the differences in the amount of water use in San Diego, California and worldwide, which is measured in percentage.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that residential is regarded as the main reason in San Diego while worldwide reveals agriculture for the major cause.
Among the sectors, 60% is the proportion of residents in San Diego Country, which is approximately 20% more than that for California. By contrast, the piece of residential in the worldwide is over 8 times as large as the fragment in San Diego. In comparison with the sector of agriculture worldwide, the piece of agriculture in California is smaller by a margin of over 40%. On the other hand, the percentage of agriculture in San Diego consists of half less than that of world wide.
In California, 39% and 28% is the proportion of residential and agriculture, respectively. On the other hand, the industry has an average segment of the other two.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... large as the fragment in San Diego. In comparison with the sector of agriculture worldwid...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...iego consists of half less than that of world wide. In California, 39% and 28% is the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...iego consists of half less than that of world wide. In California, 39% and 28% is the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03288850742 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.168894751 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286442421042 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116957807614 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104186367182 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167059698223 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12686401745 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.