The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentage of spending on different categories in an average family in two countries Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
It is clear that families in two nations spent most of their money on housing, food and other goods and services during the research period. Additionally, only a small proportion of expenditure was spent on health care and transport.
The percentage of money spent on housing in Japan was highest, at 24%. Meanwhile, the figure for Malaysia was slightly lower, at about 26%. The Japanese and Malaysian spent approximately 24% and 27% of the total expenditure was food respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for housing in Malaysia was 34% higher than 21% in Japan.
The proportion of household expenditure on transport in Japan was roughly 20% compared to 10% in Malaysia, whereas Healthcare made up only 6% and 3% of the total money in Japan and Malaysia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...20% compared to 10% in Malaysia, whereas Healthcare made up only 6% and 3% of the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02684563758 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87546104195 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2552403421 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246145327741 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105569295755 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100235671305 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167682049203 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108995662892 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.