The given pie charts compared the average proportion of expenses spent on different household needs (Housing, transport, food, medical, goods and services) for families in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that there were 3 major categories of expenditures (housing, food, and other goods and services)in both countries, with Malaysians spending the most on housing and the Japanese mostly pay for other types of goods or services. However, spending on transport and healthcare are lower in Malaysia than that of Japan in the said period.
It is clear from the data given that in Malaysia the greatest proportion of household expenditure at 34% was on housing while in Japan it accounted for 21% of the total expenses. In terms of food which was the second major household spending in the two countries with Malaysia at 27% and Japan at 24% respectively. Malaysians spend half as much as the Japanese on transportation at 10% and 20% in that order.
The lowest household outlay for both countries is on healthcare needs which were recorded with Japanese families spending twice as much as the Malaysians at 6% and 3% respectively. Also, Malaysians spend 3% less than Japanese on other goods and services at 29%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0487804878 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79705802781 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49756097561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2908832126 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123880163782 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632149653266 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629166077165 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919744693285 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673132094119 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.