the pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

Essay topics:

the pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

The graphs provides data on changing of energy production in France 2 separate years and are split into five different categories.
Overall, it can be seen that energy which was produced by gas, coal, others and nuclear increased while energy comes from petro is decreased in 1995 and 2005 in France.
Looking to the first pie chart in more detail, it is evident that 29.6% of energy, which was produced by gas is slightly lower than coal energy at 29.80% which is highest ratio in the first graph. In addition, energy production in 1999 stood at 29.27% from petro as opposed to 6.4% for nuclear and 4.90% for others.
Turning to the second data set, it can be clear that the energy was came from coal in 2005 was highest at 30.93% followed by gas at 30.31%. Furthermore, petro energy was higher than for nuclear and others, at 19.55%, 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-08-16 kubra 61 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
The graphs provides data on changing of energy production i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e split into five different categories. Overall, it can be seen that energy whic...
^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s decreased in 1995 and 2005 in France. Looking to the first pie chart in more d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
... lower than coal energy at 29.80% which is highest ratio in the first graph. In addition, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...et, it can be clear that the energy was came from coal in 2005 was highest at 30.93%...
^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than for nuclear and others, at 19.55%, 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69934640523 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32201903421 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.998148091 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138773312016 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778173053377 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519629893496 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987828468868 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055350871188 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.