The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005
The two pie graphs compare the various kind of energy production of France in two different years (1995 and 2005).
Overall, it is clearly shown that for both years, the most significant energy source came from gas and coal. The least among the five energy produced is coming from other energy sources. In all types of energy production there was only a minimal change over the ten year period.
In 1995, coal production was almost a third of the total proportion with one percent increase after 10 years with a total of 30.93%. Likewise, gas generated 29.63% which rose marginally to 30.1% after a decade.
With regards to other energy sources, petrol had a decrease of almost ten percent accounting to 29.27% in 1995 and 19.55% in 2005. In contrast, it is noted that there is an approximately five percent growth in production from both nuclear power and other resources accounting to 10.10% and 9.10 %, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imal change over the ten year period. In 1995, coal production was almost a th...
^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is an approximately five percent growth in production from both nuclear power an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, third, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9358974359 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5216978002 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3535160377 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237981285053 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10605264725 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120683236747 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168218308628 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142388893514 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.