The supplied pie charts enumerates percentage of energy production from different sources in France in 1195 and 2005.
Overall, it is obvious from the illustration that gas and coal have been used the most than any other mentioned source for energy production.
As its immediately seen, coal was used more than any other source, just under 30 per cent in 1995 and slightly above 30 per cent in 2005. Gas was the second mostly used source for energy production in France, when in 1995, 29.63 % was used and after decade, in 2005, 30.31 per cent. Petrol has played also important role in energy production in France in 1995 and 2005, 29.27 and 30.93 per cent respectively. Therefore nuclear energy did not represent majority in energy production in France, over decade its percentage raised up almost 4 per cent as well as other sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... 29.27 and 30.93 per cent respectively. Therefore nuclear energy did not represent majori...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 698.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88111888112 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49130432148 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.8996644258 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159162590799 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1057130739 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103148792166 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149826566278 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1219842677 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.