The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.

The pie charts provide information about how many devices which residents used to observe television in two different age group (18 and 25) in Canada in the years 2009 and 2019.

Overall, conventional TV in 2009 was the biggest part of the chart, but after 10 years, it became the smallest segment. In addition, while at the beginning of the survey, the tablet was the least significant, in the year 2019, that ratio made up the third biggest part of the chart.

Flat-screen TV accounted for 8% in 2009 and this figure had a sight growth by 19% after 10 years. The percentage of mobile phone was 15% in 2009 and experienced a more than one-and-a-half-time increase to 26%. And tablet made up 14% from 5% to 19% between 2009 and 2019.

Although in the first year of the chart, the numbers for laptops and desktops only differed by 2% which was 20% and 18%, after the survey period, this number has been down and equal. Especially, in the year 2009, convention TV was at 34%, respectively, the rate fell to 4%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he percentage of mobile phone was 15% in 2009 and experienced a more than one-and...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, third, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59340659341 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68230931079 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1641151369 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216535817125 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927327318158 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156864047369 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16708452134 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194313034602 0.0819641961636 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.