The pie charts below show the form of transportation to work normally used by workers in a particular city. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show the ways workers in Rockingham normally traveled to work in 2005 and 2015.
Driving car alone was the most common option that workers chose to commute to work in 2005. About 50 percent of people drove car alone to work in 2005 but the rate fell to 35% in 2015.
Less common than driving car alone in 2005 was bus and carpool. The number of people taking the bus in 2005 and 2015 still stayed the same at 15%. In 2005, one fourth of workers chose carpools, but over 10 years, it fell to 20%. In contrast to that method, the percentage of workers using bicycle or those choosing to stay at home had increased slightly. For instance, there was a slight increase in the percentage of people bicycling to work, from 5% to 10%.
Walking was still the least form of transportation to work. It accounted for 5% of workers in 2005 and still stayed the same in 2015.
Overall, the biggest and clearest change in the table is a sharp decline in the number of people in Rockingham driving car alone to work, while other forms of transport increased slightly or stayed the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, while, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27418117132 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9154625199 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9090909091 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137363374171 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661955808203 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680456249615 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109248542546 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718609084658 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.