The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts detail the process of managing the dangerous waste materials in three nations, namely the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the UK in percentages.
Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that all provided countries have their own preferred ways of dealing the waste products. Speaking of the preferred way, the UK has its discharged materials underneath its ground for 82% of the chart, the highest percentage among the countries. It is followed by Sweden with a percentage of 55 while South Korea has only 22% of the chart.
Nonetheless, the waste materials are the most recycled in Korea, covering nearly 70% of its chart, whilst Sweden dealt with the similar way, covering a quarter of the chart, and there is no option for recycling in the UK. Instead, the Britains choose to deal with the waste products by undergoing the chemical treatments or discharging at the sea with 8% for the mentioned categories. Burning the waste is not commonplace in Korea and the UK (with 9% and 2% respectively), although it has one-fifth of the chart of Sweden.
To sum up, burying the waste underground is the commonest implementation by all countries provided, followed by recycling as the second commonest one. Nonetheless, the UK has applied two alternative ways of dealing with waste such as chemical ways or dumping at sea.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nonetheless, second, so, while, speaking of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00444444444 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89862973161 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3059146492 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15398481641 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710100373251 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312746164297 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101002339943 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357679373825 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.