The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. Summarise the information by selecting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts compare the percentages of five different ways to deal with toxic waste products in three countries.
Overall, the United Kingdom is the only country that does not recycle waste but instead dumping it into the sea or using chemical treatment. In contrast, it appears that Korea recycles waste the most, while the two other countries usually bury it underground.
As displayed in the charts, 69% of waste products in Korea go through recycle process, which is by far the highest proportion, followed by Sweden with 25%. The United Kingdom, on the other hand, does not recycle their toxic waste; however, the percentage of waste being buried underground in the UK is the highest among the three countries, accounted for 82%. Sweden also uses underground method the most with 55%, while the Republic of Korea has the lowest proportion of burying waste, with only 22%.
Furthermore, the figure for incineration method is accounted for 20% in Sweden, while that of Korea and Britain are only 9% and 2% respectively. Finally, the UK is the only country that uses chemical treatment and dumping at sea methods to the dangerous waste, with the percentages for each of the methods are 8%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9900990099 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59762810981 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.562423594 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14564646581 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753275282646 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806902797773 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115420662011 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987761075993 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.