The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.

The given pie charts compare the proportion of money invested in five different sectors in a school in the UK over a period of 20 years from 1981 to 2001.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, the highest invested sector remained the teachers' salaries over the entire period. In addition, the other sectors also experienced some rise and fall during the given time length.

According to the given illustration, teachers' salaries, which led the entire investment structure in each decade, observed a dramatic spike of 10% and climbed to 50% in 1991. However, a slight dropdown of 5% dragged the investment rate to 45% in 2001. On the contrary, followed by a reverse trend, a major plummet of 10% in the spending rate of furniture and equipment slipped the rate to just 5% during the first decade. But spendings in this sector sky-rocketed by nearly 5 times in the last 10 years.

On the other hand, more than a quarter(nearly 28%) of the total expenditure was diverted to other workers' salaries in 1981. Over time, a continuous decline dropped the value down by 6% and 8% respectively in 1991 and 2001. The insurance sector rather witnessed a contrasting trend, rose at a steady rate from 2% to 15% by the end period. Also facing a few ups and downs, the resources sector first rose by 5% in 1991, before drifting down by 11% in 2001( 20% down to 9%).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing trend, rose at a steady rate from 2% to 15% by the end period. Also facing a ...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rate from 2% to 15% by the end period. Also facing a few ups and downs, the resourc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...d. Also facing a few ups and downs, the resources sector first rose by 5% in 1991, before...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71927982768 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4384578886 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182640238443 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654330140546 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923524037163 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131351664816 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128512041046 0.0819641961636 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.