The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given four pie charts compare the total group of energy manufactured by five various fuel resources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be deemed that a vast amount of electricity created in Australia with 130 units of coal while 126 system of nuclear potential in France in the year of 2000.
First of all, 100 units power generated in Australia where 50 units made by coal while 20 units made by hydro capacity which is similar with natural gas and no more than 10 units created by oil in 1980. Moreover, most of the electricity organized by coal in 2000 in Australia which was 130 units when 36 units produced by hydro function and no more than 2 units generated by oil and natural gas. However, France produced energy no more than 90 units in 1980 whereas was 25 units which was similar coal with natural gas as well as one-fifth made by oil while 15 and 5 units created by nuclear power and hydro capability respectively. In addition, large number of nuclear influence used for energy production in 2000 in France which was 126 units when 25 writs coal and oil occupied and no more than 2 units organized by natural gas and hydro power.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54245283019 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38607920583 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457547169811 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.1990296642 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.5 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.23603664747 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20410149491 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133619320753 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040883535972 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164480362365 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382802736363 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.