The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000
The pie charts illustrate information about how many units of electricity production by using five different fuel sources (coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear power and hydropower) in various areas ( Australia and France ) in 1998 and 2000.
Overall, the majority of electric power factors in Australia was coal in both years and in France, nuclear power had been used the greatest productivity of electric in 2000.
In addition, the amount of electric power made by coal in Australia in 2000 was 50 units out of 100 units while production from hydropower and natural gas were similar and it was 20 units of out of 100 units. Furthermore, the least production of electricity by consuming oil was 10 units.
However, the fuel factors structure of electric power production in Australia was not completely equal to France. The vital of nuclear power in France was not used in australia. But, comparing two years of France it can be clearly seen nuclear power usage of creating electricity in 2000 was steadily increased rather than in 1998.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar power and hydropower in various areas Australia and France in 1998 and 2000. ...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r in various areas Australia and France in 1998 and 2000. Overall, the maj...
^^
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Australia was not completely equal to France. The vital of nuclear power in Fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70420720626 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0641297961 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275781914544 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143758609932 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782912578946 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19278458488 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754876196054 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.