he chart below shows the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.

Essay topics:

he chart below shows the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.

The first bar graph illustrates the information about an average year of schooling while the second graph demonstrates the scientists and technicians per 1000 person and third graph represents the expenditure of researches and development in 1980 and 1990. All graph details are divided in to two sections (developing countries and industrial countries) also Third graph units are measured in a billion. Overall, industrial countries were increased in all categorize rather than developing countries.

Turn to first chart, In 1980, the typical years of schooling in developing countries were presented approximately 2 years but industrial countries were over 8 years. Besides, when 1990, learning years of children in poor regions were slightly climbed up and other group has been considerably developed to over 10 years. However, the different between these two types of countries had been grown from 6 years to the nearest 7 years.

Furthermore, the number of scientists and technicians in developed countries were exceeded developing countries in given two years. The gap between regions of two types was improved 1990 than in 1980. According to another graph, it has declined in the vegetative countries on spending money on research and sustainable development but, technical countries represented a major improvement for the construction in 1990 rather than 1980.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'graph' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
...d technicians per 1000 person and third graph represents the expenditure of researche...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03824451044 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6498583939 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221765058609 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108233815027 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438347993887 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164937420463 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395338568381 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.