The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts below display the amounts of electricity produced by fuel source in Australia and France in two time horizons 1980 and 2000.
To be more specific, in 1980, the total electricity production in Australia is slightly more than that in France, which is 100 units and 90 units respectively. However, French electricity production experienced a stronger growth than Australia, resulting in 180 units in total electricity, while total production of Australia reached 170 units.
When focusing on the production structure, it’s clear there were dramatic changes occurring in both two countries. For Australia, electricity supplied by coal is the largest part, up to 50 units, compared to other sources such as oil, natural gas and hydro, which are respectively 10, 20, 20 units. Nevertheless, during this 20-year period, we saw a sharp decline in both oil and natural gas, which was reduced to 2%. Furthermore, the production provided by coal surged to 130 units, while electricity from hydro power increased to 36 units not as significant as that of coal. One thing to be noticed here is that Australia doesn’t depend on nuclear power at all.
As for France, electricity supplied by nuclear power proliferated from 15 units to 126 units, while we saw a significant shrink in both natural gas and hydro power from respectively 25 units and 5 units to both 2 units. However, the amounts of electricity production of coal and oil stayed unchanged over 20 years.
In a conclusion, the charts present changes taking place both in total production and source structure in Australia and France during 20 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Blackcytrus | 74 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Thepie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected threere gionsof the world during the 1990s Summarise the information byselecting and reporting the main features and make com 78
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- It is generally believed that some people are horn with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can he taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 73
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90755167612 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518939393939 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5293705723 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228922232244 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101735708484 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861595897681 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167745086152 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871012054827 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.