The pie charts compare water consumption in the world and three continents Asia Africa and Europe by sector
The pie chart provides informations about three diffrent continents’ and world’s water consumption rates by three different sectors which are domestic,agriculture and industry.
Overall, Asia Africa and world use lot of water for agrarian purposes opposed to Europe which uses most of the water for industry. Usage of water for domestic has the least the percentage for all four pie charts.
European uses most of their water for manufacturing which is more than a half whereas world's percentage for those is only slightly less than half of European's usage. In Europe, water consumption for farming is second but in Asia and Africa usage of water for those are first ranked and its ratio is nearly two and half times as higher as than Europe which is 86 percent. This situation valid for whole the world, too.
Water consumption for house and daily purposes accounted for at least. This value is less than a quarter for all the graph. Africa, Asia and World have similar ratio 7%,6% and 8% respectively. However, Europe uses their water resources for those more which is nearly 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , agriculture
...ree different sectors which are domestic,agriculture and industry. Overall, Asia Africa an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agriculture and industry. Overall, Asia Africa and world use lot of water for ag...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he percentage for all four pie charts. European uses most of their water for ma...
^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of water for those are first ranked and its ratio is nearly two and half times a...
^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... is nearly two and half times as higher as than Europe which is 86 percent. This s...
^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percent. This situation valid for whole the world, too. Water consumption for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06593406593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78139227329 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543956043956 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4978377957 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314539818559 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136095333437 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101446127407 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225020986951 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817767351003 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.