The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared with two countries: China and India.
Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
A glance at the pie charts given reveals the China and India’s food consumption in terms of four categories in year 2008 when compared with the World’s. All in all, a striking similarity with slight difference can be noticed on the distribution of the proportion of the four categories in the mentioned countries.
It is obvious that processed food was the major energy intake in the world, with slightly over 40% of the people eating it worldwide in 2008. China and India saw a similar trend in which somewhere between 30% and 40% of their inhabitants consumed it in the same period. Also, evident is the fact that the least significant food selected by the people over the world was nuts and seed, which constituted a negligible 4% of food intake internationally. This type of food, though was also not prevalent in China and India, was with much higher proportion of consumption when compared to the world. Twofold and threefold higher intake rate could be witnessed in China and India respectively than in the world.
It is also interesting that Vegetable and Fruits and Animal Food consumed were with opposite trend in China and India. While more Chinese (32%) took Vegetable and Fruits as their diet than Indian (23%), people in India than in China consumed 12% more Animal Food.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72522650511 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.076579946 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296903567977 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129791766863 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781711156811 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197801302772 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541471957297 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.