The bar graph below shows the number of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and report in th main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the bar chart given compares the proportion of students of both genders working on the research projects for six academic subjects. Generally speaking, more men than females studied on the above mentioned researches with some exceptions.
Of the 6 subjects, male students dominated the research on 3 subjects (Mathematics, Programming and Engineering) . The most significant students’ gender imbalance recorded in this chart was Mathematics, in which male students outnumbered females almost 5 to 1. Engineering and Programming, although with 50 less boys’ participation when compared to Maths, still leaded by males. Numbering at 150, count of male students of both subjects was twofold larger than females’.
Moreover, it is interesting to note that there were subjects having number of girl students slightly exceeded boys’ - Linguistic. While around 110 girls students worked on this subject, 30 less boys, which equalled to 80, enrolled. Lastly, as for the remaining 2 subjects, Natural Science and Psychology, enrollment of students from both genders was comparable (about 200).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Mathematics, Programming and Engineering . The most significant students' gen...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun boys is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rls students worked on this subject, 30 less boys, which equalled to 80, enrolled. L...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, moreover, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72891566265 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16213760438 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704819277108 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.744546532 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19997445912 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916584139098 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567495053344 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140076859256 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038087126111 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.