The bar graph below shows the number of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the bar chart given compares the proportion of students of both genders working on the research projects for six courses. Generally speaking, more men than females involved in the academic studies for those subjects with some exceptions.
Among the six subjects mentioned, male students dominated the research on 3 subjects, namely Mathematics, Programming and Engineering. It is obvious that the most significant students’ gender imbalance recorded in this chart was Mathematics. Male students studying in this subject outnumbered females almost 5 to 1, which was a staggering disparity. Meanwhile, the other two subjects mentioned saw a twofold higher count of boys than girls.
On the other hand, Linguistic had a slightly higher female students proportion than male students. Around 110 girls students worked on this subject whereas just 80 boys took part in the research on this course. Lastly, for Natural Science and Psychology, research students from both genders were comparable (about 200).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55128205128 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91217603018 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 13.646326327 43.030603864 32% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213893263823 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933712364381 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500815488984 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152156452783 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191969273337 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.